![The Realignment [Premium Podcast]](https://supercast-storage-assets.b-cdn.net/landingpage/1716/logo/large-39789fd20d7ed65eaeb8aa3dfaa64482.png){kind=logo}
Should all political analysts say who they're going to vote for?
I've noticed that political pundits don't seem to have a problem clearly stating who they're going to vote for and why. But political analysts tend to hide and shield who they personally want to vote for to provide an illusion of neutrality. In reality, nobody is neutral, everybody has preferences, and being honest about who you will vote for shows an audience what your biases are, which builds trust. Am I wrong? Is there value in pretending to be neutral as a political analyst? Should honesty trump neutrality, or vice versa?
The President and the courts
Similar to the Kamala and Congress question, I am curious on what you think of the courts, I imagine there will be a lot of challenges similar to Biden's student loan forgiveness. An example would be Trump wanting to deport immigrants, Or Kamala price controls, I can imagine these getting caught up in the courts. How much of their platform are you expecting to get stalled in the courts?
I cant unhear the ads
Saagar, you recently talked about how odd it is that people who purport to be the news will then break and immediately talk about ads for Blue Chew or some other product and now I cannot stop hearing it where ever I listen. It opened my eyes, thanks again to both of you. I have never doubted your integrity